The Sub prime mortgage crisis made easier

Unless you have been living in a remote cave for thecomputer models began to realise that the returns as
past year or took a trip into space and have justthey stood (the investment bank receiving its
touched down again, you will no doubt have heard£100m per year in interest from all the mortgage
of, and felt the effects of, the U.S subprimeloans) required for everyone to pay their mortgage
mortgage crisis. It has rippled through the globaland for no one to default or pre-pay.
economy destroying the financial health of“Hold on, they said, I don’t think it’s
institutions, businesses and individuals that stand in itsrealistic to claim that everyone will pay their
path. But what really happened? What really causedmortgage and if they default we won’t be able
the sub-prime mortgage crisis?to sell the house at its market value necessarily and
Well I went on a mission to find out...so we must account for this in our returns”. For
I spent time in numerous jargon laden trenches andexample, say 20% of people default and the
only just managed to bend my head around a seriesinvestment bank can only recover half the value of
of esoteric concepts.the house. That means that in effect 10% of all the
Firstly there was the U.S housing price conundrum -loans are worthless, so instead of a 10% return,
why were house prices so high?investors would get a 9% return.
Then we needed to understand what MortgageSo in response to this the investment banks began
Backed Securities were and what they had to doto sell different types of shares to investors. Some
with anythingshares cost a bit more, and came with higher risk and
And finally what were Collateralized Debt Obligationshigher returns. Some shares cost less, and came with
By understanding the facts, dismantling the jargonlower risk and lower returns.
and simplifying the concepts I managed to pieceHow did they do this?
together an explanation of what really happened andThis is where Collateralized Debt Obligations come in
began to understand the subprime mortgage crisis ato play
little better.Let’s go back to our investment bank’s
The U.S housing price conundrumspecial purpose vehicle. Instead of dividing up the
U.S house prices normally rise; at least according toshare capital equally the investment bank separated
the Case-Schiller Housing Index they have been doingits 1m shares into 3 classes called Equity, Mezzanine
so at a steady pace for most of the 20th century.and Senior. These worked as follows. If you owned
However around 2000 they started to rise rapidly.Senior shares you paid less but got less return on
And from 2000 to 2006 they rose by a whoppingyour investment but at significantly reduced risk, in
80%.fact you got paid first out of the money coming in
The conventional factors that economists would usefrom the mortgages. Then if you owned Mezzanine
to explain this phenomenon are an increase in theshares you paid a little more for your shares than
demand drivers, the two most obvious being anSenior and got a little higher return but you were
increase in the population and an increase in salaries.only paid from what remained from the pool of
However although the U.S population did increase inmortgage money after Senior shareholders were
that period by approximately 1.5% salaries actuallypaid. And finally, if you owned Equity shares, the
decreased by 3%. Therefore the net effect of themost expensive shares, you got much higher returns
demand drivers went down by 1.5%.that the senior and Mezzanine shareholders but you
So another conventional economic explanation is thewere paid last from whatever was left in the pool of
supply drivers: housing must have dried up right. But ismortgage money after Senior and Mezzanine
this true?shareholders were paid.
Well in 2000 there were around 115m housing units inThese types of shares are collectively known as
the U.S with 1.8 million new units being built each year.Collateralized Debt Obligations.
So during the same period from 2000 to 2006 theSo how did all of the above contribute to the
number of housing units actually grew by about 6%.Sup-prime Mortgage Crisis?
What is going on? Demand was down, supply was upWell it goes like this:
and yet prices did not drop, in fact they skyBecause you have lots of people making money
rocketed.from the new types of shares (Collateralized Debt
Something else must have been driving up the houseObligations.) the investment community are hungry
prices, but what?for more, so the banks need to sell more mortgages
Well between 1980 and 2000, if you wanted to buyand they can do so now to more people than ever
a house you would go to your bank manager andbefore because they have reduced their lending
they would ask you to put 25% down (meaning ifcriteria in part because they are not responsible for
you wanted to buy a house worth £100,000 youcollecting the mortgages, the investment bank is, and
gave the bank £25,000 and got a mortgage on thesome investor somewhere is willing to buy from the
remaining £75,000), verify that you had a secureinvestment bank a higher value of share for a higher
job and demonstrate a good credit score, say a 700return. This is perceived by the investment bank to
points.offset the risk associated with the bank’s lending
In 2001 this changed to you needing to only putto higher risk individuals, the NINAs.
about 10% down, verify that you had a job andBut they all got their numbers wrong and instead of
demonstrate an OK credit score, around 500 points.something like 10% defaulting on their mortgages,
By 2003 this had changed to you needing to put nowhich historically may have been true and was no
money down, simply claim that you had a job anddoubt incorporated into their computer models, some
demonstrate no credit score what so ever. These40% defaulted.
people were known as NINAs : No Income, NoWhy did so many people default?
Assets. It is the mortgages given to this class ofWhen the housing market is booming and property
borrowers that the real estate industry refers to asprices are on the rise even those that default on
subprime mortgages.paying their mortgages can sell up and even make a
So the bank’s lending criteria got more and moreprofit. This way the banks get their money back and
relaxed with time, which in turn meant that theno one is really hurt. But when the housing market
number of people now able to bid on a home wasslows down those that can’t pay their mortgage
significantly larger than before. And it is this thathave no option to default and the bank has to
pushed up demand and caused the enormous rise inforeclose on the property meaning they lose money
housing prices over the last few years.and so do the investment banks and their investors.
But why did the banks relax their lending criteria toAnd this is what happened, the housing market
such an extent? To understand this we need toslowed down and house prices began to fall, due to
move into Mortgage Backed Securities.demand tailing off, a surplus of housing stock and
So what are Mortgage Backed Securities?interest rate rises.
Well, these sound rather obscure but in fact they areSo lots of people, mostly the NINAs whose incomes
not so difficult to understand. Here we go.were wholly insufficient to cover the mortgage
We start with borrowers; people like you and mepayments they took on, could no longer afford to
who need to buy a house with a mortgage. We gopay their mortgage and without any equity left in the
to the bank and we ask for say £1m to buy ahome were forced by the banks to foreclose. This
house. The bank agrees and charges us 10% interestmeant that the investors in the Mortgage Backed
on the mortgage. Say they do this with 1000Securities and Collateralized Debt Obligations had a
customers; they would have £1bn in mortgagesignificantly reduced return due to the huge number
loans and receive £100m per year in interest.of people no longer paying their mortgages. These
Then comes along an investment bank who says toinvestors included investment banks, hedge funds,
the bank, “hey we want to buy your mortgagesprivate investors, institutions such as Insurance
from you and package them up so that we can sellcompanies and pension funds and...You guessed it,
them to investors”. Now this sounds ratherbanks!
strange but it’s very simple. Basically whatA consequence of the creation of Collateralized Debt
happens is the investment bank buys the rights toObligations was that investors, not banks, would
the loans and the cashflows (basically the interestassume the risk for the relaxing of the bank’s
payments as well as any principle that is paid by thelending criteria so as to be able to offer more
borrowers) and incorporates a new company (amortgages to more people including high risk
Special Purpose Vehicle) and divides the share capitalborrowers. But in the end the banks got greedy too
into say 1m shares, now each share is worth £1,100and it’s these toxic assets that many banks are
(which is the £1bn in loans plus the £100m interestholding on their balance sheets that are expected to
they expect to receive divided into 1m shares). Thecost the U.S taxpayer about $8.5 trillion ($3,291 USD
investment bank can now sell these shares toper person) via the U.S. government’s
investors on the market and it is these shares thatcommitment to funding a host of economic stimulus
are known as Mortgage Backed securities.programs.
So what does this have to do with the subprimeI hope you have enjoyed this article and that I have
mortgage crisis? Well it turns out that the investorshelped make understanding the subprime mortgage
and investment banks with their sophisticatedcrisis easier for you.