Michigan Horseback Riding Equestrian Injury Lawyers & Claims

Michigan equestrian injury lawyers and horsebackmanage the particular equine. . .
riding lawyers representing clients injured in equestrian(c) Owns, leases, rents, has authorized use of, or
activities, like horseback riding and other events atotherwise, is in lawful possession and control of land
horse stables, must have a complete knowledge andor facilities on which the participant sustained injury
understanding of the laws regarding those types ofbecause of a dangerous latent condition of the land
lawsuits. The types of injuries from these incidentsor facilities that is known to the equine activity
are often severe, like traumatic brain injuries, spinalsponsor, equine professional, or other person and for
cord injuries, and serious orthopedic injuries.which warning signs are not conspicuously posted.
In many cases, the injured person cannot file a claim(d) COMMITS A NEGLIGENT ACT OR OMISSION
because the legislature has made horse stables andTHAT CONSTITUTES A PROXIMATE CAUSE OF
owners of horses "immune" from lawsuits. There areTHE INJURY, DEATH, OR DAMAGE.
certain exceptions to these laws that do permitIn order to pursue a case involving a horse riding
lawsuits. The State of Michigan has specificallyinjury in Michigan, it is essential hire a Michigan
addressed and provided specific immunities toequestrian injury lawyer or Michigan horse riding injury
Defendants who are sued as a result of horse ridinglawyer shortly after the incident, before evidence is
injuries to others. The Michigan Equine Activitieslost and witness memories fade. It is not uncommon
Liability Act provides in pertinent part that:for a potential Defendant to discard or misplace the
The Michigan Equine Activities Liability Act provides inequipment used on a horse at the time of an incident.
pertinent part that: "Except as otherwise provided inWe specifically dealt with a case where the
Sec. 5, an equine activity sponsor, an equineequipment was simply put back in a barn with all of
professional, or another person is not liable for anthe other Defendant's horse equipment, making it
injury to or the death of a participant or propertyalmost impossible to distinguish the equipment used
damage resulting from an inherent risk of an equineat the time of the incident.
activity." MCL 691.1661, Emphasis added. The broadAn early investigation and site inspection is essential
exceptions to the general rule of non-liability are setto preserving key evidence. Position of the horse,
forth in Sec. 5. Sec. 5 states in pertinent part that:rider, other horses, and other riders may prove to be
"Sec. 3 does not prevent or limit the liability of anpivotal in a Michigan horse case. Memories regarding
equine activity sponsor, equine professional, orthe location of the incident will surely fade over time.
another person if the equine activity sponsor, equineConfiguration of the property, including location of
professional, or other person does any of thecorrals and mounting areas, may change over time.
following:To the extent that the case involves a closed head
(a) Provides equipment or tack and knows or shouldinjury, a client may not be in a position to remember
know that the equipment or tack is faulty, and thepertinent facts that would assist in the litigation
equipment or tack is faulty to the extent that it is aprocess.
proximate cause of the injury, death, or damage.Early retention of equestrienne safety experts (when
(b) Provides an equine and fails to make reasonableexpert testimony is necessary will add significant
and prudent efforts to determine the ability of thevalue to the lawsuit and provide necessary testimony
participant to engage safely in the equine activity andto avoid summary dismissal of a lawsuit by a trial
to determine the ability of the participant to safelyjudge.